Talk:Post-Britpop
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Post-Britpop article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
 | Post-Britpop has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Repetition and Bias
[edit]I noticed that on 3 separate occasions this article went out of it's way to describe the genre as bland and sterile. This is fine on it's own if describing contemporary or historical opinion, however, the repetition is unnecessary and lends an overall negative tone to the article. 2600:6C40:7800:1694:23D7:79AC:B3A3:41EF (talk) 06:34, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
Reliability
[edit]Is the definition of Post-Britpop properly backed up here? The articles cited to have used the word all are quite obviously referring to "post-britpop", the decapitalisation implying that it is not intended to be a new key terminology and is simply referring to bands that appeared in British alternative rock after the britpop wave died down. 88.107.246.185 (talk) 02:05, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Music good articles
- GA-Class Rock music articles
- Mid-importance Rock music articles
- WikiProject Rock music articles
- GA-Class music genre articles
- Music genres task force articles
- GA-Class Alternative music articles
- Mid-importance Alternative music articles
- WikiProject Alternative music articles