Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a24ca2733c8f962d

Jump to content

Talk:Porticus Octaviae

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Carlotm in topic Imprecision in lede

Untitled

[edit]

Shouldn't Porticus Octaviae and Porticus Octavia have separate pages (Porticus Octavia redirects to Porticus Octaviae), since both this article and Lacus Curtis make the point that the Porticus Octaviae and the Porticus Octavia are separate but often confused structures? Electron100 02:13, 27 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Done Neddyseagoon - talk 09:58, 10 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

yes it should but they should down in the links side.--60cent 06:22, 13 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Imprecision in lede

[edit]

In the lede it's said that the Sant'Angelo in Pescheria church was built circa 770 AD. Michael Ott wrote in The Catholic Encyclopedia (1913)/Volume 14/St. Symphorosa (see Wikisource logo Works related to Catholic Encyclopedia (1913)/St. Symphorosa at Wikisource) that Pope Stephen (II) III transferred the remains of St. Symphorosa to that church in 752. So the church must have been built at least in the first half of the VIII century CE. Carlotm (talk) 20:37, 22 January 2016 (UTC)Reply