Talk:Portable Application Description
Add topic | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Hello. I'm trying to add a link to a free, ad-free online tool I've made at http://rspain.zxq.net/javascript/webmaster/pad_generator.htm which is similar to other linked tools, but in fact superior to them in various ways. Someone is saying I'm a spammer and this link is somehow a COI, so should I just get a friend to do the exact same thing I did? Would that cure this person of the COI problem? How about if I just get a friend to press the undo/revert button? RSpain (talk) 16:50, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Web masters needs massive redesign in order to make the site compatible with ASP PAD v4
[edit]Some AppVisor applications are rejected because by the moderators because the name of the product does not appear often enough on publisher's web site. In our case it appears 9 times. We had to add it on more time in top of the page otherwise the reviewer keep rejecting our application.
Is this something worth mentioning on Wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.22.206.173 (talk) 13:40, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Conflict of interest
[edit]User 94.231.0.67 keeps deleting any reference to the fact that the AppVisor software ISN'T free as it pretends: "Without restrictions or fees". I added a link that shows the charges/fees for AppVisor but thee user 94.231.0.67 undid my edits. The user 94.231.0.67 (probably the owner of AppVisor) edited the article multiple times to make AppVisor seem freeware! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fedra (talk • contribs) 20:03, 14 March 2018 (UTC)