Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2ab1d2ac968d937

Jump to content

Talk:Port Egmont

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Tim1965 in topic Old Style vs. New Style dates

Untitled

[edit]

I am very curious what the relation between this place and the important Dutch House of Egmond (often spelled Egmont) is. User:Krator (t c) 15:52, 27 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Port Egmont. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:30, 8 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Old Style vs. New Style dates

[edit]

The Julian calendar was still in use in Britain in 1765. At that time, the Julian calendar was 11 days behind the Gregorian calendar. Today, the Julian calendar is 13 days behind the Gregorian calendar. It's critical to use the correct "days behind" for 1765, not 2025. - Tim1965 (talk) 17:18, 25 January 2025 (UTC)Reply