Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a46262604c26122e

Jump to content

Talk:Por

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 12 years ago by BD2412 in topic Merger proposal

To keep as a redirect?

[edit]

Note that Wikipedia is not a dictionary; it'd be fair to judge if 'power on reset', 'point of record', etc. don't have articles by themselves, then the page would best serve as a redirect to Portugal. ~ PseudoSudo 23:35, 11 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Power-on_reset has an article. the ones that don't have, will be created and/or written by me or someone else in the future.
what is this Who_(pronoun)? remove it then. it would be best left as an incomplete page. 88.218.27.9 00:01, 12 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
Fair enough; I expanded the page a bit to meet the disambiguation guidelines. What's wrong with Who (pronoun)? ~ PseudoSudo 00:56, 12 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
great. you said wikipedia is not a dictionary, that means that is should redirect to wiktionary when you click who_(pronoun). 88.218.27.9 03:23, 12 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
this is the right one for the country code http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Country_codes:_O-R#Portugal 88.218.27.9 03:28, 12 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Merger proposal

[edit]

I propose the merging of the disambiguation page Por into the disambiguation page POR—or vice-versa—due to the fact that the title of the latter page is merely a capitalization of that of the former, and thus the two should merge into a single disambiguation page for the three-letter disambiguation title (with one page ultimately redirecting to the other), rather than confusingly being split into two short disambiguation pages of virtually the same topic as they currently remain. In addition, many of the articles listed on each page are better suited for the other, leading to further inconsistency and confusion. This problem must be resolved as soon as possible. — |J~Pæst| 02:53, 22 May 2013 (UTC)Reply