Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23277acac7c1dfc

Jump to content

Talk:Poposaurus

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 11 years ago by 124.197.35.126 in topic Skull material

Plantigrade feet?

[edit]
Restoration by Jeff Martz

I found a free restoration on Flickr (right), and it seems to have some differences from the one here (which has kind of theropodish legs). The legs here are much more robust, and it seems obvious that the feet are plantigrade, not digitigrade. FunkMonk (talk) 04:00, 19 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Gauthier et al. (2011) say "It is not clear whether Poposaurus gracilis walked on the balls of its feet only (digitigrade) or whether it first placed the sole of its foot on the ground and then rolled up onto the ball while walking (plantigrade), like archosaurs ancestrally", and they suggest that Poposaurus may have been plantigrade when walking and digitigrade when running. But I'll thicken the lower legs, since right now they look like theropod drumsticks! Smokeybjb (talk) 01:03, 21 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
Alright! FunkMonk (talk) 10:54, 24 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

might want to mention it was a carnivore ....

[edit]

. . . and perhaps some speculation as to its diet. HammerFilms 68.19.15.106 (talk) 18:46, 13 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Skull material

[edit]

Might want to include that cranial material was found: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/258442655_Cranial_remains_of_Poposaurus_gracilis_%28Pseudosuchia_Poposauroidea%29_from_the_Upper_Triassic_the_distribution_of_the_taxon_and_its_implications_for_poposauroid_evolution 124.197.35.126 (talk) 21:18, 22 October 2014 (UTC)Reply