Talk:Pony (programming language)

Pony is substantial enough now to have it's own page

Although this Language is in it's infancy, it is seeing some small traction in various communities. I am not knowledgeable enough on it to fully finish this page but will attempt to make corrections when possible.This page previously was marked for deletion or was deleted without substantial evidence. Milotheshort (talk) 17:00, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

• 3+1/2 years later, I'm still not sure there are the resources to pass our GNG. But there are some unused sources at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25957307 — Charles Stewart (talk) 18:20, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Use of HackerNoon as Reference

David Gerard removed this reference. Alex Lashkov is classified as a tech journalist, not blogger. Submissions to site goes under editorial review. HackerNoon is a company, not personal website.Wukuendo (talk) 21:35, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

It is literally WP:UGC, so is generally unreliable. Perhaps this qualifies as an expert WP:SPS, but it seems unlikely.

More broadly - there's already solid specialist sources in there like InfoQ. You don't need the UGC group blog, it just makes the article seem puffed up - David Gerard (talk) 14:32, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

Was looking at it from the angle that Lashkov could be argued to qualify as a subject matter expert, beyond the issue of the site, but will concede that is a difficult argument. Particularly when the qualifications or credentials are not emphasized by the site or article it pertains to.Wukuendo (talk) 23:51, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

References