Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22c5dab0fa5d806

Jump to content

Talk:Polytunnel

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Skepticalgiraffe in topic Merge with Row Cover

Controversy over polytunnel

[edit]

Deleting the controversy section. Unless arguments for why polytunnels are a good or bad farming technique, or good/bad for the land, it's hardly a controversy. It's a disguised bias point of view. [july 2, 2006-srm]

The controversy section as it stood was not particularly encyclopaedic. However, that there is a controversy surrounding the use of polytunnels in the UK is relevant. Quoting from a radio programme transcript is just not the best way to go about it. Holford 02:12, 3 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
I agree. A controversy most certainly exists in the west Midland shire counties (eg Herefordshire) about whether or not large expanses of polytunnels are damaging the appearance of the countryside to the detriment of tourism - which in many places is more important to the local economy than farming. It seems to have died down a bit in 2007 and 2008, though, possibly because outdoor tourism has itself been hit by two poor summers. 86.136.250.170 (talk) 22:32, 10 August 2008 (UTC)Reply


Merge with Row Cover

[edit]

Merge this article with Row cover. Skepticalgiraffe (talk) 00:30, 18 July 2016 (UTC)Reply