Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23e03399d5a6bf7

Jump to content

Talk:Polyceroidea

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 16 years ago by Snek01 in topic Confusing history of this page

Confusing history of this page

[edit]

This page has previously been deleted twice, even though the article currently still exists. The article is being kept for historical reasons (it's out of date taxonomy, but still might be useful to someone, and therefore it should have a talk page I guess.) If someone disagrees with me, please let me know. Thanks, Invertzoo (talk) 22:18, 15 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

It most certainly is confusing! But it's hard to know how to start cleaning it up -- I have been working on the Polycerids recently and have followed what looked to me to be B&R taxonomy and then came across a Polycerid family (the Aegiretidae), which were wrongly assigned to the Onchidorididae.... so I have ended up remodifying this page, though as you say the taxonomy is not correct. Any suggestions? Seascapeza (talk) 15:12, 10 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Also: this is cut and pasted from B&R: Superfamily Polyceroidea (= Phanerobranchiata Non Suctoria)

   * Family Polyceridae
   * Family Aegiretidae
   * Family Gymnodorididae
   * Family Hexabranchidae
   * Family Okadaiidae

so, according to that, the taxon most certainly is used. Anyone else's views? Seascapeza (talk) 15:16, 10 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

It is corrected now. Thank you Seascapeza, that you have found a mistake. --Snek01 (talk) 18:18, 10 September 2009 (UTC)Reply