Talk:Polka de W.R.
Add topicLatest comment: 11 years ago by 122.56.26.1 in topic it's actually not a waltz
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
It's actually an arrangement
[edit]I know the difference between the two can sometimes get blurred, but it's not really a transcription (as the original was already for piano, from what I can tell), but an arrangement -- it's somewhat different than the original, which is printed out in the Threlfall's and Norris catalog (ISBN 085967617X). But I didn't want to change it until I got some input, just to be sure. ♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫ (talk) 17:15, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
- I would support that characterisation. -- JackofOz (talk) 07:24, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
it's actually not a waltz
[edit]it's in 2/4 and the left hand doesn't go oom cha cha, it goes more like oom-pa oom-pa — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.56.26.1 (talk) 00:20, 8 June 2015 (UTC)