Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2a95c75ed664e12

Jump to content

Talk:Plume (fluid dynamics)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Tamagon103.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 06:47, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

The section entitled "Simple plume modelling" needs rewriting

[edit]

The last part of the subject section (just below the four numbered comments) needs to be rewritten or removed. As it now stands, it is completely incomprehensible. mbeychok (talk) 22:32, 27 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Since no one has responded to my above comment, I will remove that incomprehensible section. mbeychok (talk) 17:17, 31 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Remove or move Space Shuttle image?

[edit]

A rocket "plume" doesn't seem like a very good example of a plume. It's really a vertical contrail, it's verticalness caused not by the motion of one fluid through another away from the source, but by the source moving through the atmosphere and leaving smoke and water vapor along the way, a cloud rather than a plume. Craig Butz (talk) 20:27, 21 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Agreed, its a jet not a plume. Replaced image with an image of a plume. Kees08 (talk) 02:44, 28 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Since Gaussian Plumes was the topic that I was focusing on, the page has more information on it than any other plumes that were briefly introduced. This may make the Gaussian Plumes overrepresented in the page, so contributions to other types of plumes would make the article more balanced.Is there another wiki page that is devoted to Guassian Plumes that I overlooked?Tamagon103 (talk) 18:08, 28 April 2017 (UTC)Reply