Talk:Plug compatibility

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Wanted: Legal Background

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article is currently missing the legal background that allowed the rise of plug-compatible machines. A cursory web search turned up the following articles:

The New York Times: I.B.M. Is Found Guilty in Antitrust Suit And Told to Pay Telex $352.5‐Million
The New York Times: Mighty I.B.M. Takes Its Lumps
“Telex v. IBM: Implications for the Businessman and the Computer Manufacturer.” Virginia Law Review, vol. 60, no. 5, 1974, pp. 884–909.
Reason Magazine: Producer or predator

A user familiar with the legal aspects of plug compatibility could help add those aspects to the article. - wneo (talk) 06:27, 16 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.

Talk:Plug compatibility

Wanted: Legal Background