Talk:Platform gap
Add topicLatest comment: 1 year ago by Thebiguglyalien in topic Proposed merge of Platform gap filler into Platform gap
 | The content of Platform gap filler was merged into Platform gap on 6 April 2025. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Platform gap article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Proposed merge of Platform gap filler into Platform gap
[edit]You can't talk about a platform gap filler without talking about the platform gap as well. There's no real reason for the platform gap filler to have its own article, it makes more sense to discuss it in the context of the platform gap article. There's a section in platform gap that really says all there is to be said. This article is just one of those instances where people start adding examples where they live and it turns into a giant directory. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 22:40, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- I agree that there seems to be both duplication and gaps in coverage because of the two poorly-coordinated articles. I suggest that the Platform gap filler article be converted into List of platform gap filler systems or similar, as one of the many Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists articles. Reify-tech (talk) 17:44, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support merge, it doesn't make sense to cover these topics separately. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 23:56, 12 February 2025 (UTC)