Talk:Platform exclusivity
Add topicLatest comment: 16 years ago by Taelus in topic Assessment
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Platform exclusivity article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find video game sources: "Platform exclusivity" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
 | It is requested that an image or photograph of Platform exclusivity be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other websites. |
Assessment
[edit]- The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations where necessary.
- It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. The use of citation templates such as
{{cite web}}is not required, but the use of <ref></ref> tags is encouraged.
- It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. The use of citation templates such as
- The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies.
- It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing.
- It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing.
- The article has a defined structure.
- Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind.
- Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind.
- The article is reasonably well-written.
- The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but it certainly need not be "brilliant". The Manual of Style need not be followed rigorously.
- The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but it certainly need not be "brilliant". The Manual of Style need not be followed rigorously.
- The article contains supporting materials where appropriate.
- Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams and an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content.
- Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams and an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content.
- The article presents its content in an appropriately accessible way.
- It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. Although Wikipedia is more than just a general encyclopedia, the article should not assume unnecessary technical background and technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible.
- It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. Although Wikipedia is more than just a general encyclopedia, the article should not assume unnecessary technical background and technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible.
Overall it's a good write-up, but the need for expansion will probably take longer than a week or two to hit B-class. Holding at C-Class, Mid-Importance for now.
- The article focuses solely on current-gen consoles, however exclusivity has been around for several years.
- It feels disjointed. A 'history' section is definitely needed here, as there is little background for the topic.
- Down the road the list of [x] platform games links might be better suited as an infobox with exclusives listed per-platform
Reviewed by: 13:52, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks, I will get digging for some cites to cover a history, and non-current gen content. They proved illusive the first time around but I am sure there will be some good ones buried somewhere. As for the list articles, perhaps a group effort at WP:VG might help, I will probably raise that in the future. --Taelus (talk) 00:29, 20 January 2010 (UTC)