Talk:Plastination

Controversey

http://tvnewswatch.blogspot.com.es/2012/08/rumours-persist-following-gu-kailai.html 47.60.67.17 (talk) 10:12, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Computer simulation alternative

Proponents for the increased respect and courtesey for the human body point out that the inventors went ahead with the institute without due consideration to alretnative non intrusive methods of anatomy illustration such as digital computer rendered simulation. Computer simulation of the human body would alow much closer and detailed analysis of the human body. Zoom in, see through and body position maneuverability could allow a digitally simulated model much greater detail and content than a physical model ever could. Redistributing the simulations in the form of software over the internet, could further accomplish a broader viewer base and through a much more flexible means without ever requiring the use of bodies. Because of the versatility of software and the development of computer technology today, a virtual model is not only vastly supperior and more available to viewers world wide, but also an opportunity for further scientific development. The lack of a free, open source, world wide online available simulation while continuation of plastination, is not only unscientific, but also disrespectfull to the human body. -Written without signing by User:Nadyes

What controversy? This is apparently written by someone who knows hardly anything. At least for the coming 100years plastination won`t be replaceable by any other technique and even then only partially. Besides not everyone is a religious fundamentalist and believes that throwing a stone is disrespectful or likewise using dead carcasses with complete anonymity. Besides what you said gotta be the stupiest thing i heard in a year or so. CT is used because it can be performed in a live individual but it will never not even close exceed an actual cutting tomography. Theoretically not possible and there are worlds in between. Yes Plastination also enabled cutting tomography. I can savely claim that plastination will be used for the next several hundreds of years.Slicky 15:04, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Someone should consider seperating criticisms out of the main article (see step seven) ... and this is a kinda one sided argument article.69.158.59.78 14:36, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Allegations of Chinese Human Rights Violations involving Plastination

The article makes no mention of the history of allegations that the Chinese government has sold the bodies of political prisoners for use in plastination. This subject has received news coverage, is the subject of legislation, and deserves coverage here. 21:27, October 31, 2011 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.203.88.125 (talk) 19:26, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Plastination. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090515122825/http://meduni02.edis.at:80/plast/plmeth.html to http://meduni02.edis.at/plast/plmeth.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:44, 18 October 2015 (UTC)