Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a228a2bd5d762e5c

Jump to content

Talk:Plastic container

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 8 months ago by Nepenthous in topic Alternatives

Alternatives

[edit]

Two points regarding the section titled "Alternatives".

Firstly, the citation to the Economist only establishes the manufacture of alternatives as being more resource-hungry. But in an average case scenario (i.e. not assuming perfect recycling; which anyway doesn't exist for plastics), an alternative like a paper bag has minimal environmental impact post-manufacture, whereas a plastic bag may last for hundreds of years and leach microplastics into the soil and groundwater. An accurate environmental assessment would have to include these calculations. The Economist has not done this.

Secondly apropos the remark that "allegedly safe packaging gets into the natural landscape in the form of waste": two of the three given alternatives (cotton bags, cardboard boxes) biodegrade quickly, so they do not seem to help the case being made. Nepenthous (talk) 11:21, 31 October 2025 (UTC)Reply