Talk:Planulozoa
Add topicLatest comment: 8 years ago by Khajidha in topic My cuts
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
My cuts
[edit]"The Planulozoa are considered vermiformes (worms), and may have a planuloid origin.[1][2] Cnidaria are recognized as being bilateral. A proposal[1] to expand the definition of Bilateria to include the Cnidaria rendering it equivalent to Planulozoa has not widely been implemented." 1) they are not considered "vermiformes" (a noun), they are considered to be "vermiform" (an adjective) 2) Cnidaria are not recognized as being bilateral, they are recognized as the sister group to the group Bilateria --Khajidha (talk) 15:39, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
References
- 1 2 Baguñà, Jaume; Martinez, Pere; Paps, Jordi; Riutort, Marta (2008-04-27). "Back in time: a new systematic proposal for the Bilateria". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences. 363 (1496): 1481–1491. doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2238. ISSN 0962-8436. PMID 18192186.
- ↑ Hejnol, Andreas; Martindale, Mark Q. (2008-04-27). "Acoel development supports a simple planula-like urbilaterian". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 363 (1496): 1493–1501. doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2239. ISSN 0962-8436. PMID 18192185.