Talk:Planetary (Go!)

GA review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This review is transcluded from Talk:Planetary (Go!)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Leafy46 (talk · contribs) 06:50, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

Reviewer: RedShellMomentum (talk · contribs) 02:58, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

Will review tomorrow. RedShellMomentum 02:58, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

Apologies for the delay, I'm incredibly busy. I'll continue this review later today, though. RedShellMomentum 00:03, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

@Leafy46: So sorry for keeping you waiting. My comments are below. RedShellMomentum 23:01, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your review. I have addressed all of your comments, let me know if there are any other concerns. Leafy46 (talk) 06:31, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

 Pass now, thanks for all of your hard work with these MCR articles! RedShellMomentum 19:27, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

Lead

• Remove "power pop" from "A dance-punk, electropop, power pop, and punk funk song" since it doesn't have a source supporting it (keep it if you can find one, though).

• Y Guess I forgot about one of them, good catch. Leafy46 (talk) 06:31, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

• "was conceived after the band began experimenting" could be "was conceived during the band's experimentation".

• Y Done. Leafy46 (talk) 06:31, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

• "due to long wanting to write a dance song" could be "as they had long wanted to write a dance song".

• Y Sure. I don't really like repeating things word-for-word in the lead and the article body here, but I've made the change. Leafy46 (talk) 06:31, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

• "was announced to be released" is too wordy; consider changing it to "was announced for release".

• Y Done Leafy46 (talk) 06:31, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

• "The track received divided reviews from music critics, with some regarding it as an album highlight while others criticized its sound and lyrics." → "The track received mixed reviews from music critics, with some calling it an album highlight while others criticized its sound and lyrics."

• ? I think 'divided' works here as a synonym for 'polarized'? As the album was indeed both called an album highlight and "awful". Leafy46 (talk) 06:31, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

Background

• "due to being unsatisfied" is clunky; either use "because they were unsatisfied" or "after becoming dissatisfied".

• Y Used the latter. Leafy46 (talk) 06:31, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

• "started again" in "The band subsequently started again" is awkward; either use "restarted work" or "began again".

• Y I moved 'Subsequently' to the beginning of the sentence, as I feel like that was what you really found awkward as opposed to the phrase "started again" on its own. Let me know if this is wrong Leafy46 (talk) 06:31, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

• "long wanted to write a dance song" could be smoothed as "had long wanted to write a dance song".

• ? This is... already what the article says? Unless I'm missing something. Leafy46 (talk) 06:31, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

Composition and lyrics

• "has been stylistically compared to" is passive-heavy; consider using "has been compared stylistically to".

• Y Sure, done. Leafy46 (talk) 06:31, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

• "Additionally, Kevin O'Donnell of Spin compared the track stylistically to those by Franz Ferdinand" should be attributed to its respective source.

• Y D'oh. Done. Leafy46 (talk) 06:31, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

Release

• "was first released to Spin" → ambiguous; better as "premiered by Spin".

• Y I like that, changed. Leafy46 (talk) 06:31, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

• "the song was later released" → repetitive phrasing; vary wording.

• Y Resolved by changing the previous to "premiered". Leafy46 (talk) 06:31, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

• "officially be released" → "officially" is unnecessary.

• Y Removed. Leafy46 (talk) 06:31, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

• "however, the single was ultimately released" → overlong transition; "but it was ultimately released..." is cleaner.

• Y Partially done. I've replace "the single" with "it", but have not changed "however" because using "but" there would be grammatically iffy. Leafy46 (talk) 06:31, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

• "was included as the opening song of Gran Turismo 5" → could be "was used as the opening song" for clarity.

• Y Done. Leafy46 (talk) 06:31, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

Music video

• "with tickets costing £4" could be "with tickets priced at £4".

• Y Seems pretty minor? But done. Leafy46 (talk) 06:31, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

Reception

• Drowned in Sound sentence is unsourced.

• Y D'oh x2. Done. Leafy46 (talk) 06:31, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

• Alternative Addiction sentence is unsourced.

• Y D'oh x3. Done. Leafy46 (talk) 06:31, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

• Unitalize Sputnikmusic.

• Y Done. Leafy46 (talk) 06:31, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

Accolades

Great!

Credits and personnel

• Reduce name to "Personnel".
  • Y Done Leafy46 (talk) 04:04, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

Chart performance

• Reduce name to "Charts".
  • Y Done Leafy46 (talk) 04:04, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

Release history

Great!

Refs

• Refs 1, 3, 4, 9, 11, 12, 15, 16, 18, 20, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 28, 30, 31, 34, 35, 37, 38, 39, and 40 should use {{cite magazine}}.

• Y This isn't on the GA criteria? But since you've gone through the effort of compiling citation numbers, I've made the change. Leafy46 (talk) 06:31, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

• Refs 29 and 36 should use |publisher= instead of |website=.

• Y Done. Leafy46 (talk) 06:31, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

Final review

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.