Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a25761ab49e8c892

Jump to content

Talk:Planeat

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 13 years ago by SummerPhD in topic Critical reception

Critical reception

[edit]

Yes, in another article it's one paragaph. However, what is done in another article is a horrible way to write an article.

Another article might have "Awards" before "Critical reception". Does that mean that article is right? Maybe, maybe not. In this case, the one "award" this movie won was from a non-notable film festival.

In the present case, the "Critical reception" section cannot be one paragraph. Why? Yes, in another article it is. Maybe that case is correct, maybe not. It doesn't matter as this is different. In this article, we don't have an introductory sentence summarizing what critics had to say. The other article does. Why don't we add one here? Simple, we don't have anything to summarize it that isn't synthesis. In the other article, we have Rotten Tomatoes' summary. In this case, the movie has gotten too little attention to have been reviewed by enough critics for Rotten Tomatoes to have a summary. As a result, lumping them together produces a pseudo-paragraph with no main idea. Rather, each review is its own little stubby paragraph. - SummerPhD (talk) 02:49, 23 November 2012 (UTC)Reply