Talk:Pilk
Add topic | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hey Queen of Hearts, would you mind if I moved this cat to PilkandCookies per WP:ACATR? I just wanted to ask; as, from my reading, Pilk itself would seem to be the subject of the ad campaign rather than the campaign itself. All the best, —a smart kitten[meow] 00:30, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- (noting for the talk page record that I've boldly done this) —a smart kitten[meow] 01:31, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
MERGE: Shouldn’t this be merged with Dirty Sodas?
[edit]The dirty soda page itself is a stub. 2/3s of the Background is just about dirty sodas in general. There’s no reason to have an article specifically about Pilk, it’s just restating info that should be on the other page. Any disagreement? ChocolateCharcuterieBoard (talk) 04:57, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
- Eh, there are many sources this could be expanded with (maybe I will now that I've been reminded) and it would be quite unwieldy on the dirty soda page with those sources. charlotte 👸♥ 05:26, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, it seams like it's discussion on dirty soda's is either unnecessary and/or would fit better in the dirty soda's article. Personally, I think this shouldn't be merged with the dirty soda's article, considering all the other dirty soda's get there own article. and most of these seem to have just as much importance, if not less, than the Pillk article. Gumminggooner (talk) 14:54, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Should this article be expanded?
[edit]I remember seeing a bunch of memes for this dirty soda awhile ago, But I'm not sure if that should be put in the pop culture section or into it's own section. If expanded at all. Gumminggooner (talk) 20:49, 13 July 2025 (UTC)