Talk:Pilgrimage

Merge from Pilgrim

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

To merge Pilgrim into Pilgrimage for reasons of overlap. Klbrain (talk) 23:28, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

---

Essentially same subject, pointless content fork. - Altenmann >talk 22:43, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Oppose A pilgrim is a person. trainrobber >be me 17:35, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

• Weak support, although if this merge happens the stuff about non-religious pilgrims would have to go from the main pilgrim article. – GnocchiFan (talk) 16:10, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
• Support merge on the grounds of overlap and context; the topics are so closely related that they are best discussed in one place. This is common practice, with pages like Carpenter redirecting to Carpentry. Klbrain (talk) 13:59, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

  Y Merge completed Klbrain (talk) 23:28, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Thanks, clearly overdue. One issue I glancingly note this creates, is just how many images are packed into this article. So I'm going to pull out some to reduce the WP:STACKING and WP:SANDWICHING.-- Patrick Neil, _oѺ^∞/Talk 13:55, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

WP:BIAS

It's obviously tricky to put together given the many traditions swirled around in China but the area definitely needs its own subsection of the article covering its own Buddhist traditions as well as native practices like the imperial pilgrimages to Mount Tai & other locations, major Taoist attractions, and the (mostly) secular Confucian, republican, and Communist pilgrim sites ("Red Tourism"). — LlywelynII 03:19, 20 August 2025 (UTC)