Talk:Photoelectrochemical process

Absorption (chemistry)

This should have its own page, since it's a non sequitur on the photoelectrochemical page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.20.39.28 (talk) 03:50, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Section moved to Sorption page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nimblecymbal (talk • contribs) 04:50, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Oh look at this randomly merged page ...

Whether pages should be merged or remain independent DOES NOT depend on whether it is a popular word in current research and applications. Why a physical phenomenon (such as photoexcitation) is included in an article on a specific chemical interaction like this? I'm a chemistry student, I can't stand it; this is not the way chemists or physicists write Wikipedia. I protest. SzMithrandir (talk) 23:02, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

So I'm creating "photoexcitation" right now.

Plagiarized content

This seems to be lifted verbatim from an Encyclopaedia Britannica article (which is helpfully listed as reference 10). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.79.36.249 (talk) 11:17, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

• The entire article? Looking at the histor

y of the article that seems unlikely. Do you mean a section? Please clarify which section? V8rik (talk) 21:06, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

No, not the entire article. The section on the Stark-Einstein law, that is, the section containig the reference I mentioned.

"Photoisomierzations" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Photoisomierzations has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 August 27 § Photoisomierzations until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 08:46, 27 August 2026 (UTC)