Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This article is part of WikiProject Freemasonry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Freemasonry articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to join us in our labors, please join the discussion and add your name to the list of participants. The "Top of the Trestleboard" section below can offer some ideas on where to start and what to do.FreemasonryWikipedia:WikiProject FreemasonryTemplate:WikiProject FreemasonryFreemasonry
This article is within the scope of WikiProject North East England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of North East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.North East EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject North East EnglandTemplate:WikiProject North East EnglandNorth East England
Latest comment: 13 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
A list of Masters is unnecessary, as is a list of Officers and meeting particulars. If there are notable Masters, they should be listed, but first initial and last name aren't very useful. We already have an article on Masonic Lodge Officers, so there is no need to enumerate that here. Meeting particulars smack of advertising, and that is not permitted on WP. MSJapan (talk) 19:12, 19 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
I have removed the list of Masters again, for the same reasons enumerated above. Every Masonic Lodge (and Grand Lodge for that matter) has a Master every year of its existence. Therefore, there's nothing particularly special about a list to prove some sort of "continuity", and we discourage lists of loosely associated people (see WP:NOTDIR). MSJapan (talk) 13:27, 14 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I closed the AfD as keep because there was a clear consensus as to the notability of the building. There was also some discussion about moving the article, but there wasn't a clear agreement as to the destination title. If anyone has a specific title to suggest, I'd advise following the process at requested moves to generate a consensus on the correct title for the article. —Darkwind (talk) 01:23, 6 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
