Talk:Phil Cuzzi
Add topic | The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When editing this article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve it, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, use the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
[edit]Here's a citation (though I'm sure there are some more reliable) showing the crew acknowledging his missed call in the recent game, if anyone wants to add it . 206.127.185.95 (talk) 03:00, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
I'm not sure if your reference to the ALDS Game 2 call being "fair by at least one foot" is a direct quote from some source, but the video clearly shows it was inches. Ikcerog (talk) 18:05, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
I agree with the above, an article on Sporting News said the ball landed four to six inches fair. 24.215.210.115 (talk) 21:33, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
Controversy
[edit]What is controversial about this article? Are the facts in dispute? Tomsv 98 (talk) 23:59, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
- Well, the tone could be considered negative, I suppose. AutomaticStrikeout (talk) 20:15, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
Removed sentence referring to investigation
[edit]I removed the sentence in the first paragraph referring to an MLB investigation into Cuzzi's behavior at the Phillies-Giants game at San Francisco on Sunday July 7, 2025. There's absolutely zero information on the internet about this from any sports or otherwise reputable news source.
Here's what I removed: "He is currently under investigation by MLB for fixing a game between the San Francisco Giants and Philadelphia Phillies on July 7th, 2025."
If it turns out other sources confirm this, please put it back or I will. GTO3DEUCES (talk) 07:50, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
2nd time in only 3 hours had to remove false information
[edit]Once again, had to go into page to remove this information: "He is currently under investigation by MLB for fixing a game between the San Francisco Giants and Philadelphia Phillies on July 7th, 2025."
There is absolutely ZERO information from MLB, the umpires association, or any credible news source. Whoever keeps putting the above sentence (information) in should be stripped of their Wikipedia privileges. GTO3DEUCES (talk) 12:35, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
- The unsourced content is a clear and unambiguous violation of WP:BLP policy. Revert on sight, and if it continues, the page will need protection. AndyTheGrump (talk) 13:16, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
- Wikipedia controversial topics
- Biography articles of living people
- Start-Class biography articles
- Start-Class biography (sports and games) articles
- Low-importance biography (sports and games) articles
- Sports and games work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class Baseball articles
- Low-importance Baseball articles
- Start-Class Umpires articles
- High-importance Umpires articles
- Umpires articles
- WikiProject Baseball articles
- Start-Class Referees articles
- High-importance Referees articles