Talk:Phenoperidine
Add topicLatest comment: 11 years ago by Java76 in topic Article Changes
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Phenoperidine article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Phenoperidine.
|
is this drug on the market anywhere?
[edit]this is bugging me. hard information to find. The article should say... still looking. Jytdog (talk) 06:36, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
I had trouble finding this as well unfortunately Java76 (talk) 19:43, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
Article Changes
[edit]Jytdog,
I noticed the changes you made to the phenoperidine page. I am a new Wikipedia user that wanted to improve a stub article. Is there any advice you can offer concerning the way I had created the page that resulted in your changes? In terms of content, layout, sources, etc. ? I really appreciate your suggestions.
Thank you, Java76 Java76 (talk) 19:41, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for asking Java76! each of my edits has an edit note explaining it. if there is any one of them that is not clear, please ask! Thanks. (in case you don't know, the article page has a "view history" tab, and if you click on that, you will see all the changes with their edit notes, and you can also select any two versions and compare them (including two adjacent versions). You can also link to any such comparison. here is the first change I made. if you look at the page, you can see my edit note, and the changes I made below. and you can click "next edit" and go to the next one, etc etc). We call the link showing the changes (like the one above under "here") a "diff", and if you provide a link to a diff, and write something like "your edit note said X but I don't understand the problem - can you please explain more?" or something like that, i would be happy to answer) Jytdog (talk) 20:06, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
Thank you so much. I appreciate the details provided to access the edit notes. Java76 (talk) 20:30, 18 December 2014 (UTC)