Talk:Phaeodaria
Add topicLatest comment: 1 month ago by 1isall in topic Requested move 28 May 2026
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
 | On 28 May 2026, it was proposed that this article be moved from Phaeodarea to Phaeodaria. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Requested move 28 May 2026
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. Clear consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) 1isall (talk | contribs) 13:24, 4 June 2026 (UTC)
Phaeodarea → Phaeodaria – Phaeodaria should be used as this is the most common taxonomic name for these organisms, it's used as they are a subclass as part of the class Thecofilosea. Also, this name should be used for consistency with the automatic taxobox and the rest of the article. See sources: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-018-1241-1, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-64227-w, https://doi.org/10.33265/polar.v42.9584, https://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/bitstream/handle/10915/186676/Documento_completo.pdf?sequence=1, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315425100714. Jako96 (talk) 12:55, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
- Yes. — Snoteleks (talk) 00:57, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
- Support. Plantdrew (talk) 15:46, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.