Talk:Phaeocedus

Spiders Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spiders, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spiders on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpidersWikipedia:WikiProject SpidersTemplate:WikiProject SpidersSpiders
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Simon

Latest comment: 7 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Who does this name belong to? Which Simon first described Phaeocedus? It is unclear from the usage. Does anybody know? --Kiril kovachev (talk) 20:33, 18 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

I've added a wikilink. In the context of spiders, "Simon" is one of the most famous spider taxonomists, the Frenchman Eugène Simon. Peter coxhead (talk) 20:40, 18 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, very useful link. Sorry for late response. Kiril kovachev (talk) 16:40, 12 September 2018 (UTC)Reply