Talk:Peter Kuttner
Add topic| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 29 January 2019 and 7 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Rachael.bos.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:17, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Review
[edit]This is a good start, but this needs more development.AmyDeer (talk) 21:08, 6 March 2018 (UTC) Use the bibliography you've gathered to write the rest of your entry. Consider sections on Kartemquin, Rise Up Angry, and his work on Hollywood productions. Consider adding links to the artists and filmmakers with which he worked. Format your bibliography and citation list according to Wikipedia standards. Review WP:CS. Make sure to write in complete sentences.
Review by Jeremy
[edit]Looks like you've got some great sources and there's so much good info out there on Peter's work! Excited to see where this goes!
-J — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scottie19182018 (talk • contribs) 04:58, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
Review by Claire
[edit]Separate Kuttner's personal life and work life into two different sections. Inform us about Kartemquin Films and what he did there. Utilize the most useful information your sources give you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cjbentley666 (talk • contribs) 05:25, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
Review
[edit]The lead section is very concise and the number of citations is good. The organisation of the article makes sense and I don’t see any changes that need to be made there. Here is a list of a few content gaps that I found; Some parts in the newsreel section are a little vague, “during his stay in new york” could be clarified. Additional information in the activism and community service section about the free clinics and the actual work being done. Kartemquin section: add explanation of what the organisation is and who Gordon Quinn is. Later Career section: might not be necessary to include the reference to Jon Surge in the first sentence, or provide more context. Filmography: clarify what type of work he was doing on these big box films because these are not the films he is known for and the title “filmography” is misleading as it suggests he is a director or actor. You may want to add more details about his personal life if that information is available. from Rowanh12 4 March 2019