Talk:Peter Daube

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers.

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Article issues

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This is a 2007 BLP that with only 37 words of prose that is a dictionary entry, or pseudo biography with an embedded filmography list improperly sourced through the "External links" by IMDb that is considered unreliable. See: Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources (#IMDb) and WP:ELP (#IMDb)

When a search turns up nothing substantial, not even more than a token listing at the New Zealand Film Commission’s Film library, then it is not unexpected for notability to be questioned. Sources may be "out there" but at a point someone needs to present some. WP:NEXIST states: However, once an article's notability has been challenged, merely asserting that unspecified sources exist is seldom persuasive, especially if time passes and actual proof does not surface. Otr500 (talk) 11:27, 17 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.

Talk:Peter Daube

Article issues