Talk:Peter Boysen Jensen

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cielquiparle (talk) 14:08, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that the work of Danish plant physiologist Peter Boysen Jensen was fundamental to understanding phototropism, and paved the way to the discovery of the plant growth hormone, auxin?
  

Source:

Larsen, Poul (November 1960). "Peter Boysen Jensen 1883–1959". Plant Physiology. 35 (6): 986–988 – via Oxford University Press.

Snow, R. (January 1938). "Phytohormones". Nature. 141 (3558): 53–54. doi:10.1038/141053a0. ISSN 1476-4687.

Zažímalová, Eva; Petrášek, Jan; Benková, Eva (2014). Auxin and Its Role in Plant Development. Springer. p. 363. ISBN 9783709115268.

• ALT1: ... that the work of Danish plant physiologist Peter Boysen Jensen paved the way to the discovery of the plant growth hormone, auxin?
  

Source:

Larsen, Poul (November 1960). "Peter Boysen Jensen 1883–1959". Plant Physiology. 35 (6): 986–988 – via Oxford University Press.

Snow, R. (January 1938). "Phytohormones". Nature. 141 (3558): 53–54. doi:10.1038/141053a0. ISSN 1476-4687.

Zažímalová, Eva; Petrášek, Jan; Benková, Eva (2014). Auxin and Its Role in Plant Development. Springer. p. 363. ISBN 9783709115268.

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Robert Spencer Finkbine

Created by Elias Ziade (talk). Self-nominated at 11:58, 27 December 2022 (UTC).

Interesting life and work, on fine sources, subscription, Danish and French sources accepted AGF. I prefer the ALT hook, to not expect too much plant physiology. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:03, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

The nominator is currently indefinitely blocked, but their talk page makes it seem that they will likely be unblocked soon. SL93 (talk) 01:37, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

Seems like they're being conditionally unblocked tomorrow? theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 05:54, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

theleekycauldron I said likely unblocked because the blocking admin added "(to give time to other CUs to give their tuppence, if they so choose)" The nominator has now been unblocked. SL93 (talk) 20:35, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

That's my bad, SL93, I thought you said he wasn't gonna be unblocked soon. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 23:46, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

unblock secured. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 09:43, 17 January 2023 (UTC)