Talk:Perth Panthers
Add topic| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A fact from Perth Panthers appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 22 August 2025 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This page should not be speedy deleted because...
[edit]This page should not be speedily deleted because it is historic data about an ice hockey club from Scotland who where playoff champions, all information is supplied by other sites and referenced — Preceding unsigned comment added by Themarkchristie (talk • contribs)
- Comment: The sources listed: 1st one, leads to only one page, 2nd dead link, 3rd one, another dead link, the 4th one is failed. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs)
Why do the logos on the uniforms not match those on the photographs?
[edit]What is the source of the built images? BusterD (talk) 15:01, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 14:09, 15 August 2025 (UTC)
- ... that Scotland-based ice hockey team the Perth Panthers were composed of mainly Americans and Canadians?
- Source: Advertiser ("The original club, which used to draw big crowds to the old Dunkeld Road rink in the post-war years, folded in the mid-fifties. It had been heavily influenced by American and Canadian ex-servicemen, with a sprinkling of talented locals.")
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Umbilical Cord (Fukushima)
- Comment: To do QPQ within a day or two. Given that it was only briefly in mainspace in December for a few hours, then draftified, and that the original version was an AI-generated mess, I think this should be eligible as a 'new' article.
BeanieFan11 (talk) 23:55, 2 August 2025 (UTC).
- Wow, Nice to see this being back to the mainspace after I draftified it. I do think this is considered as "new". It is long enough, I see no other issues. 8% hits on Earwig. Hook is interesting, cited and on the article.
QPQ is not done yet. So, waiting for it.Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 04:56, 3 August 2025 (UTC)
- @Miminity: QPQ added. BeanieFan11 (talk) 20:35, 4 August 2025 (UTC)
- Okay, good to go then.
Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 01:15, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
- Okay, good to go then.

