Talk:Perry Hartnett

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This review is transcluded from Talk:Perry Hartnett/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Gonzo fan2007 (talk · contribs) 21:30, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

I'll review this one. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 21:30, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Comments

• He lost his starting job in the 1983 training camp and was released, then signed again, appeared in two games as a backup, and was released again. I would split in to two sentences.
• Ref spot check: #3, 6, 8, 16, 19, 22

Looks good, putting on hold. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 21:28, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

• @Gonzo fan2007: Issue addressed - I also changed up this sentence if that's alright. BeanieFan11 (talk) 21:34, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
  • Looks good, passed. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 21:39, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 02:33, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that a replacement player was injured replacing an injured replacement player? Source: Hartnett was one of the NFL's replacement players in 1987 - this report on one of the games with replacements mentions that Hartnett came in for (replacing) the injured John McGarry, and then was injured himself
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Jordan Love
  • Comment: A good quirky hook, in my opinion.

5x expanded by BeanieFan11 (talk). Self-nominated at 20:16, 20 October 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Perry Hartnett; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

• @BeanieFan11: Please supply a QPQ as soon as possible. Z1720 (talk) 17:43, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
  • @Z1720: Added. BeanieFan11 (talk) 20:06, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
    • @Z1720:, do you plan on completing this review? « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 17:05, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
      • No, my note was just to get BeanieFan11 to submit the QPQ and I have not reviewed the article in any other way. I'll let another reviewer do the complete review. Z1720 (talk) 17:15, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
• Full review needed now that QPQ has been supplied. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:05, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
• New enough, long enough. Hook short enough and sourced (as is every paragraph). No neutrality problems found, no copyright problems found, no maintenance templates found. QPQ done. Good to go.--Launchballer 09:25, 13 December 2023 (UTC)