Talk:Perl

GA Reassessment

Perl

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result: Delist Sourcing and prose issues still remain Aircorn (talk) 09:50, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

It has 44 citation needed templates. This does not meet the WP:GA requirements. There might be more issues, but this alone is enough to delist it. PhotographyEdits (talk) 20:14, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

• Comment It looks like one user added 50 citation needed templates in 3 minutes on December 16th, 2020, taking the count from 4 to 54. That is a serious bit of tag bombing and 50 in 3 minutes does not suggest a lot of thought was put into these tags. Yet some of these tags are warranted, so a review is reasonable. --{{u|Mark viking}} {Talk} 11:10, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
• Comment The prose needs some work too. Pinging Feezo who got it to GA status. Aircorn (talk) 23:25, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

"Just another Perl hacker" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Just another Perl hacker has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 21 § Just another Perl hacker until a consensus is reached. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (Goodbye!) 08:09, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Article issues and classification

• Reassess article to C-class.

There article has entirely too much unsourced material, tagged and untagged, failing the WP:B-class criteria #1, The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited.

From the earliest category tags: "Articles containing potentially dated statements from 2010", January 2011, 2017, and December 2022.

Articles with unsourced statements from January 2016, February 2016, and November 2017.

Articles with failed verification from June 2022. -- Otr500 (talk) 00:43, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

"Tim Toady Bicarbonate" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Tim Toady Bicarbonate has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 July 23 § Tim Toady Bicarbonate until a consensus is reached. Toadspike [Talk] 19:46, 23 July 2025 (UTC)