Talk:Periodic table
Add topic| This article is written in British English with Oxford and IUPAC spelling (colour, realize, organization, analyse; note that -ize is used instead of -ise; aluminium, sulfur, caesium) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
| Periodic table is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on February 28, 2004, and on January 8, 2018. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The content of Placement of lanthanides and actinides in the periodic table was merged into Periodic table. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
"inner electrons responsible for chemical properties" ?
[edit]"Bohr then attempted to understand periodicity through electron configurations, surmising in 1913 that the inner electrons should be responsible for the chemical properties of the element."
Really, *inner* electrons? That is unintuitive. If the statement is correct it needs some extra words to make that clear - perhaps just put (sic) after "inner". ~2025-33904-40 (talk) 03:15, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
- The cited article, Kragh 2012, doesn't support that statement:
According to Bohr, the chemical similarity between elements in the same group was a result of the atoms having the same number of electrons in the outermost ring (and not, as J. J. Thomson had earlier suggested, in the inner rings.)
Jähmefyysikko (talk) 03:58, 6 February 2026 (UTC)- @Jähmefyysikko That seems sufficient justification to change "inner electrons" to "outer electrons". Please make that change - the article is locked for me. ~2025-33904-40 (talk) 06:52, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
"Peroidic table of elements" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
The redirect Peroidic table of elements has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 April 8 § Peroidic table of elements until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 02:48, 8 April 2026 (UTC)
"Peroidic table" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
The redirect Peroidic table has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 April 15 § Peroidic table until a consensus is reached. J947 ‡ edits 03:33, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
- Wikipedia articles that use Oxford spelling
- Wikipedia articles that use IUPAC spelling
- Wikipedia articles that use British English
- Wikipedia featured articles
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page twice
- Wikipedia former featured articles
- Old requests for peer review
- FA-Class level-3 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-3 vital articles in Physical sciences
- FA-Class vital articles in Physical sciences
- FA-Class Chemistry articles
- Top-importance Chemistry articles
- WikiProject Chemistry articles
- FA-Class chemical elements articles
- Top-importance chemical elements articles
- WikiProject Elements articles
- FA-Class physics articles
- Mid-importance physics articles
- FA-Class physics articles of Mid-importance