Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a26141ec8f384652

Jump to content

Talk:Perimeter Highway

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 11 months ago by Jeffrey34555 in topic Requested move 1 August 2025

Construction Date

[edit]

How could the highway have been built in 1969 as stated when there were bridges for it built in the 1950s (as stated) and the final segments weren't completed until the 1990s? --68.179.16.113 19:38, 27 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Unsourced Material / Original Research

[edit]

GMoney0805 did an edit on this page today (Nov. 23, 2019) for the Exit List section. I read the page and found that thee section Inner city beltway, the second half of the Perimeter plan was tagged in 2010 as not citing sources.

The second issue with this block of text (as of Nov. 23, 2019) is that it appears to be "original research", judging by the way it was written. For example:

Several years ago a group working with a councillor, worked to stop the loop from going into the Transcona area, and had the roadway's land designated a natural prairie grass park.

The third issue with this section is that it is about the "Suburban Beltway" not the Perimeter Hwy., the subject of this article. I suggest moving some of this text to the article about Winnipeg's Inner Ring Road and citing any and all relevant (NPOV) text.

The fourth issue is the title of the section itself. Calling it the "Inner city Beltway" is not accurate as that was another proposed ring road entirely and called "The Downtown ByPass" as proposed by the Wilbur Smith report of 1957. So in effect, back in the 1950s there have been 3 ring roads proposed or constructed since then:

  1. Perimeter Hwy.
  2. Suburban Beltway / Inner Perimeter / Inner Ring Road
  3. Downtown ByPass

Jimj wpg (talk) 20:59, 23 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Jimj wpg was my exit list edit ok? I simply removed I-29 as a destination from the Pembina Highway exit, just because it is not listed on the sign along the Perimeter.

GMoney0805 (talk) 17:25, 24 November 2019 (CT)

GMoney0805, yes, it's just fine. Jimj wpg (talk) 23:29, 24 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Jimj wpg sounds good. GMoney0805 (talk) 17:39, 24 November 2019 (CT)

My vote would be to remove the Inner Beltway section altogether. It's been ten years and no one has bothered to add any citations, so I would say it is fair game for removal. If someone can find sufficient supporting sources to support, the Inner Beltway would probably work better in a separate article.Rkehler3 (talk) 04:51, 12 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 1 August 2025

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jeffrey34555 (talk) 01:01, 15 August 2025 (UTC)Reply


– I don't see a clear primary topic here. 2600:1700:6180:6290:1CDE:998A:F6DF:72D (talk) 15:51, 1 August 2025 (UTC)  Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 16:39, 8 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Note: Canadian Wikipedians' notice board, WikiProject Canada Roads, and WikiProject Manitoba have been notified of this discussion. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 08:11, 11 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.