Talk:Perfect fifth
Add topicLatest comment: 2 years ago by 81.175.221.202 in topic Self-referential definition
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Perfect fifth article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 12 months  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Self-referential definition
[edit]The article says
"Perfect intervals are also defined as those natural intervals whose inversions are also perfect, ...".
But this is a circular definition since it uses the concept of perfect to define perfect. Should it be rewritten like this:
"Perfect intervals are also defined as those natural intervals whose inversions are also natural, ..."? 81.175.221.202 (talk) 14:33, 7 January 2024 (UTC)