Talk:Perfect Interpenetration
Add topicLatest comment: 3 months ago by Javierfv1212 in topic Probable AI generated content and other issues
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
Feedback from New Page Review process
[edit]I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Going by this title's deletion log (and WP:EARWIG), at least you put a lot of effort into getting this Buddhism topic onto WP.
Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 04:14, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
Probable AI generated content and other issues
[edit]Hi - I added the AI generated tag here, as the original edits by Jollyjalopy show many clear indications of being LLM output, and a lot of the text remains in the current version. Thus, it needs review for hallucinations, tone, sourcing, etc. Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:17, 23 September 2025 (UTC)
- Hi. I removed the tag. While I was aware that the original edits by Jollyjalopy show indications of LLM output, I reviewed it myself and edited it significantly, adding numerous citations to the section on Thich Naht Hanh as well as removing several passages that were not relevant / rewording others. As it stands, I don't believe there are any real issues with the current text, at least from my own reading of the sources and understanding of the Plum Village tradition. The rest of the article was written by me and another user without LLM usage as is policy. If there are any further issues with the Jollyjalopy text I feel it makes more sense to handle it on a case by case basis at this point, since it is no longer an LLM output but my own creation which however used some of that previous text. Javier F.V. 19:29, 25 April 2026 (UTC)