Talk:Per Scholas
Add topic | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
When I look up "Per Scholas" in Wikipedia I see a notice at the top challenging the neutrality of the content showing. This warning/notice indicates that I should click to the Talk Page for Per Scholas to find out why this note was added, and what the reviewer's ground were for claiming this description to be questionable. But when I clicked the Talk Page link I came to a screen stating that "Wikipedia does not have a talk page with this exact title." As such, the neutrality challenge shows but with nothing visible that a reader could judge its merits on. Given that, what does a Neutrality warning mean? Transparency should require that reasons for red flags be clearly visible. (Note: I work part time at Per Scholas and add that I do so because I appreciate their nonprofit mission. Consider this fact if you will in judging my comment and questions here.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.156.236.138 (talk) 20:32, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
- 'But when I clicked the Talk Page link I came to a screen stating that "Wikipedia does not have a talk page with this exact title."' So, this means you started the page. Please, next time, sign your posts with four tildes. Thank you.
- Anyway, the article has been made neutral by me and another user; it is now netral, for the most part. 50.14.142.33 (talk) 11:36, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Rewrite
[edit]This article still has quality and neutrality issues per the current banners, it also needs ref improvement as it overly relies on primary source links. Some potentially useful refs were removed back in 2012. I will try updating the article when I have some time. - Indefensible (talk) 00:21, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
AI
[edit]Flagged for AI, details: This 2025 rewrite, note WP:AISIGNS, most noticeably AIATTR but also vocab distro typical of LLM articles from 2025-26, particularly about companies Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:04, 17 July 2026 (UTC)