Talk:Penis sheath

Contested deletion

Because it has coverage in several reliable sources and I literally create dit a few hours ago, why do people delete instead of try to improve if they think it's bad even thought there are many sources?★Trekker (talk) 11:25, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

We already have a much better atarticle on it.Slatersteven (talk) 11:27, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Um no, you don't. This is a much broader subject.★Trekker (talk) 11:28, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

What material is here that is not in the other article?Slatersteven (talk) 11:31, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

If you feel like putting in a little bit of effort you could look at the sources and see that there is more to add that I haven't had time to do yet, why do some people on this website seem want to ruin stuff for no reason?★Trekker (talk) 11:32, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Are you also capable of reading that the koteka is something which is specific the tribes of New Guinea but that a penis sheath in general have been used pretty globally by many types of people globaly?★Trekker (talk) 11:35, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

So why not then re-write the article we have, rather then have two on what is (in essence) the same subject?Slatersteven (talk) 11:36, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Because they're about two independently notable things. The koteka is clearly notable in itself as is the penis sheath in general.★Trekker (talk) 11:41, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

I am not sure this is going anywhere. I do not think you have made a good case. But I will let others decide.Slatersteven (talk) 11:44, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Why are so many people on this site obsessed with having a few article as humanly possible, even when it makes little sense?★Trekker (talk) 11:47, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

So people do not have to wade through 15 separate articles to find the information they want.Slatersteven (talk) 11:50, 7 December 2017 (UTC)