Talk:Pee curl
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 4 months ago by CommissarDoggo in topic history section too broad?
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
history section too broad?
[edit]the history section is more about the French pissoirs than the dutch pee curl. some pissoir context is needed, since it informed the pee curl, but things like the 1832 pandemic don't seem as related to the pee curl Technocolorhorses (talk) 02:54, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
- I kept as much as I did in the history section because it describes why objects like the pee curl was necessary in the first place, that and the fact that at the time it seemed too small for a background section. That being said, looking at the rest of the article, the sections are fairly small anyway. CommissarDoggoTalk? 10:29, 30 March 2026 (UTC)