Talk:PeaceMaker
Add topic | This article was nominated for deletion on 2006 July 9. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
 | You are an administrator, so you may disregard the message below You are seeing this because of the limitations of {{If extended confirmed}} and {{If admin}}
You can hide this message box by adding the following to a new line of your common.css page: .ECR-edit-request-warning {
display: none;
}
Stop: You may only use this page to create an edit request This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is subject to the extended-confirmed restriction. You are not an extended-confirmed user, so you must not edit or discuss this topic anywhere on Wikipedia except to make an edit request. (Additional details are in the message box just below this one.) |
| Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates to the Arab–Israeli conflict.The following restrictions apply to everyone editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. |
 | This article contains a translation of PeaceMaker from fr.wikipedia. (356816925 et seq.) |
copyvio
[edit]this page was essentially an unaltered copy of the game website, , so i deleted it and replaced it with a stub. It needs some work . . . --heah 02:05, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
How is this "article" anything but a free advertisement for this game?
In reality, how is any article little but an advertisement for what is being described? Be it a game, a car, or a religion. Mushrom 17:29, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
External links
[edit]What do you think about removing the next two links from the article?
- Thomas Barnett blog on PeaceMaker - Also it has PeaceMaker in the title, the article talk about something else.
- Game Developers Conference 2005 - does not hold any valuable information
Simulator?
[edit]Is the statement that the game simulates the conflict appropriate? At best, the game simulates political views on the conflict of its creators and sponsors. Saying that it "simulates", creates an impression that the consequences of your decisions in the game will be some how close to their consequences in the real world. Or at least, they will be close to what scientific consensus says it will be. But as the conflict is a political issue, there is no any consensus. Mark Matusevich (talk) 18:26, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
Educational video games category
[edit]The game should not be in "educational video games" category. Propaganda is not an education after all! What do you think? Mark Matusevich (talk) 18:26, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
Well, it teaches people about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and it has no bias. Israel may be able to attack Palestine, but in the real world as well, Palestine is weaker. 62.31.242.55 (talk) 15:45, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
- It is clear about its political position, and is educational in teaching the different challenges confronting Israeli and Palestinian leaders. Tedperl (talk) 18:22, 29 May 2015 (UTC)