Talk:Paul Keating
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Paul Keating article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
| This It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Boost Mobile
[edit]"Telstra on Monday announced it would acquire Boost Mobile... Keating holds a 29 per cent stake in Boost Mobile" (source) 190.99.107.218 (talk) 14:19, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
Infobox Portrait
[edit]I propose a more recent photo be used for his infobox to better represent Keating as he currently exists. I suggest one of these from 2017, or if we don't like those, maybe this one from 2007.
- Paul Keating 2017 01
- Paul Keating 2017 02
- Paul Keating 2007
- Official portrait, 1993
Lord Beesus (talk) 02:21, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- I support the use of one of the images from 2017. I like 02 better as it is slightly less pixelated. It is indeed a great idea to change the main image in the infobox as Keating has largely moved on from politics, so the image should reflect what he currently does which is public speaking and well represented here in these images presented. The 2007 one looks much less flattering by showing his full body and the lighting makes him look almost ghastly. Qwerty123M (talk) 02:47, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- I personally like the 2007 one more and thought it was more flattering (which is mainly why I included it) but I think recency should be prioritised. I'll take your support as enough of a consensus to change the image. :) Lord Beesus (talk) 06:17, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
- By convention the official portrait should be kept, and it is also objectively better than any of the images proposed here. All other prime ministerial pages (such as Whitlam, Fraser, Hawke, Rudd, Gillard, Turnbull, Morrison and Albanese) have official portraits, which must be prioritized and utilized over pictures taken in informal contexts Szekere07 (talk) 11:25, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
- Official portraits are generally the best quality images and it is usually best to use them when they are available. TarnishedPathtalk 13:17, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
- By convention the official portrait should be kept, and it is also objectively better than any of the images proposed here. All other prime ministerial pages (such as Whitlam, Fraser, Hawke, Rudd, Gillard, Turnbull, Morrison and Albanese) have official portraits, which must be prioritized and utilized over pictures taken in informal contexts Szekere07 (talk) 11:25, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
- I personally like the 2007 one more and thought it was more flattering (which is mainly why I included it) but I think recency should be prioritised. I'll take your support as enough of a consensus to change the image. :) Lord Beesus (talk) 06:17, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
To add to article
[edit]The current version of this article states that Katherine Keating had a relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell, but recently released emails show that Katherine Keating communicated directly and extensively with Jeffrey Epstein himself. Shouldn't we add that fact to this article? This source includes many of these emails: https://kaitjustice.substack.com/p/katherine-keatings-lawyers-threatened
These documents show that Katherine Keating had a sustained, documented relationship with Jeffrey Epstein from at least June 2011 through February 2013, well after his 2008 conviction. The documents prove that this relationship involved regular email communication, scheduled meetings, and her physical presence at gatherings in Epstein's home. The documents prove that Epstein was actively interested in aspects of Katherine Keating's media career, demanded status reports, and was trying to connect her with people like Bill Gates. The documents prove that she wrote to him in language that reflected deference, gratitude, and emotional vulnerability.
~2025-32865-45 (talk) 19:14, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
- Given that she is the daughter of the subject of the article, I don't know that all of that detail is really relevant - and not sure if Substack is regarded as a reliable source anyway. If there's a media source that can be used for a brief update, maybe... Laterthanyouthink (talk) 03:48, 9 February 2026 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- B-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in People
- B-Class vital articles in People
- B-Class biography articles
- B-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- High-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- B-Class Australia articles
- High-importance Australia articles
- B-Class New South Wales articles
- Low-importance New South Wales articles
- WikiProject New South Wales articles
- B-Class Sydney articles
- Top-importance Sydney articles
- WikiProject Sydney articles
- B-Class Australian politics articles
- Top-importance Australian politics articles
- WikiProject Australian politics articles
- WikiProject Australia articles
- B-Class organized labour articles
- Mid-importance organized labour articles
- WikiProject Organized Labour articles
- B-Class politics articles
- High-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles




