Talk:Patrick Henry College
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Patrick Henry College article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
| Patrick Henry College was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Patrick Henry College. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081229071627/http://www.purcellvilleva.com:80/documents/Financial%20Reports/Welcome%20Map%20and%20Street%20Index.pdf to http://www.purcellvilleva.com/documents/Financial%20Reports/Welcome%20Map%20and%20Street%20Index.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071228194505/http://www.soulforce.org:80/article/1158 to http://www.soulforce.org/article/1158
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070714191822/http://www.pbs.org:80/wnet/religionandethics/week939/interview2.html to http://www.pbs.org/wnet/religionandethics/week939/interview2.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:53, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
DOE? Title IV and accreditation
[edit]I have not edited the page but DOE is the Department of Energy. The correct abbreviation is ED. Moreover, the school could not have been a Title IV eligible institution in 2005 because it was not accredited until 2007. Accreditation is required for eligibility (which they do not use). David Cary Hart (talk) 17:19, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- David Cary Hart, I found an archive of the source cited by the next sentence. Obviously WP:ABOUTSELF, but what do you make of it? I don't know enough about the subject matter to assess. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 19:13, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
(talk) Either that memo is wrong or the date of accreditation is wrong. Accreditation is required for participation in Title IV. — Preceding unsigned comment added by David Cary Hart (talk • contribs) 15:21, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
Good article reassessment
[edit]- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: delist (t · c) buidhe 03:05, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
2008 GA with myriad issues. Too short lead, missing elements such as seal/logo image for infobox, wide chunks of unsourced content, and bare URLs. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 08:51, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy Delist – per nom. It's had that tag for seven years so that's honestly embarrassing. – zmbro (talk) 20:41, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delist too much unsourced prose, and too much prose sourced to primary or non-RS sources. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 16:55, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delist - uncited text and outdated material, such as discussion about the moot court team's activities from almost 20 years ago. Hog Farm Talk 06:49, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delist - I have reviewed the article carefully. I agree with the reasons previously mentioned in support of delisting the article in this thread. Donner60 (talk) 03:13, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delisted good articles
- Old requests for peer review
- Former good article nominees
- C-Class Virginia articles
- Mid-importance Virginia articles
- WikiProject Virginia articles
- C-Class Higher education articles
- WikiProject Higher education articles
- C-Class Conservatism articles
- Low-importance Conservatism articles
- WikiProject Conservatism articles
- C-Class Christianity articles
- Low-importance Christianity articles
- WikiProject Christianity articles
- Wikipedia pages with to-do lists