Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22c1635cf15d96e

Jump to content

Talk:Pathankot district

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 14 years ago by PhnomPencil in topic District don't exists

District don't exists

[edit]

It seems there aren`t a district called Pathankot in Punjab: the reference isn´t a true reference about its creation, and the links to India 2011 census data don´t include this district. --Antur (talk) 03:57, 13 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

see link on Fazilka district article (both created post-census) Crusoe8181 (talk) 04:12, 13 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
Gah! So these are the only two districts created since the census, meaning there are now 642 districts? (Not including the Chhattisgarh bifurcations, which have been announced but won't be official until 2012)? Thanks. PhnomPencil (talk) 12:09, 13 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
3 new ones in Uttar Pradesh, Bhimnagar district is one; cats etc created but whether they use the correct orthography is anyone's guess- appear to be at leat 3 spellings of each. Crusoe8181 (talk) 02:46, 14 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
OK thanks for the info, Crusoe. I'm still wrapping my head around the districts as they were six months ago. I'm glad they mention the tehsils; the census maps include those, so it will be easy to figure out the borders. Cheers, PhnomPencil (talk) 02:55, 14 October 2011 (UTC)Reply