Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a26f30a12d8ccdd8

Jump to content

Talk:Patagosphenos

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 14 days ago by Plantdrew in topic Automatic taxobox?

Automatic taxobox?

[edit]

@PaleoNerd1905:, what is your objection to using an automatic taxobox for this article? It's going on 5 years since you left a note:

"DO NOT replace this taxobox with some automatic one, this is very fresh reclassification research and is all but settled (read the text); there are different views within the scientific community, wait till the discussion among the paleontologists is settled and then it can be replaced"

There is nothing to read in the text of this article about any different views in the scientific community. The sole reference in the article and subsequent papers treat this genus as a member of Eilenodontinae (e.g this one). There do seem to be different views as to whether Eilenodontinae is in Sphenodontidae or Opisthodontia (and I suppose Eilenodontinae might not even be monophyletic). The Eilenodontinae article mentions that, as it should. But that doesn't have any bearing on whether this article should have an automatic taxobox with Eilenodontinae as a parent. Plantdrew (talk) 21:30, 22 July 2026 (UTC)Reply