Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2310451d896a8fe

Jump to content

Talk:Pastilla

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

here we go again

[edit]

@M.Bitton the source literally states "Origin:Morocco", and this should be mentioned in the article one way or another, You can rephrase it if you want but don't remove sourced content.

"We follow the text, not a stray word" the so-called word is part of the whole text! It's not "stray", that's not an excuse at all.

"it cannot originate from it and be brought to it from Spain (at the same time)": that's another usual OR from you. Where exactly in the source it is mentioned that it was brought from spain? Simoooix.haddi (talk) 21:32, 6 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

1) You reverted MrOllie (who actually read the source properly). 2) the word "origin" is not part of the text (the explanation). 3) If you have difficulty understanding the meaning of "brought to Morocco by Sephardi Jews", then I suggest you ask someone to help you. M.Bitton (talk) 21:40, 6 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
@M.Bitton
1)- Yes i did and i have explained why.
2)- "The word "origin" is not part of the text (the explanation)" yes, and?
3)- I also suggest you read the article of Sephardic Jews, since you attributed them to Spain (like your usual OR). Also "brought by Sephardi jews " doesn't necessarily mean brought from outside Morocco. Sephardi jews existed in Morocco as well, that's a scholarly source and it's not likely to contradict itself (as you suggest). Simoooix.haddi (talk) 21:59, 6 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
brought to Morocco by Sephardi jews doesn't necessarily mean brought from outside Morocco This is so hilarious, it needs framing. M.Bitton (talk) 22:09, 6 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
@M.Bitton Alright, could you explain what would a scholarly source mean by this : "Origin:Morocco"? even a 5 years old child can understand it. You clearly suggest that the source is contradicting itself. Simoooix.haddi (talk) 22:19, 6 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
@M.Bitton and @MrOllie neither of you gave any valid reason for your edits yet all what i see is OR. And M.Bitton, you didn't answer any of my questions yet, you're just trying to impose your baseless POV.
Also why did you remove the preview i added? Simoooix.haddi (talk) 00:05, 7 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
The wording of the source is clear, and it is not the "brought by Sephardi jews" misquote you're arguing about above. The correct wording is "Sephardim brought pastilla to Morroco" which does necessarily mean it was brought from somewhere else. Since the Sephardic Jews come from Andalusia this is obviously Marks agreeing with the theories of the other historians cited in the article. Also, it is not required that you agree with our reasoning in order for it to be valid. See WP:SATISFY. MrOllie (talk) 21:23, 8 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
@MrOllie ,Thank you for your reply. Gil Marks didn't mention anywhere in his book that pastilla was brought from Andalusia (or Spain). Since he didn't precise the historical context of its origin and Sephardi jews existed in North Africa as well (a quick read of sephardi jews article could confirm that) we cannot directly conclude what he meant by that ( I think you already know what that is called). Anyway, I'd be glad if you just answered the question i asked M.Bitton above (which they didn't answer yet): what would a scholarly source mean by this : "Origin: Morocco"? And do you suggest that the source is contradicting itself? SimoooIX (talk) 22:22, 8 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
@MrOllie Also here is the full quotation from the book. "sephardim brought pastilla to Morocco and, after the Ottoman version of phyllo, called Warka, reached the Maghreb, cooks substituted it for spanish pastry" SimoooIX (talk) 23:15, 8 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
spanish pastry - from Spain. Where the Sephardi Jews came from. What a coincidence! MrOllie (talk) 23:18, 8 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
@MrOllie What about "substituted it"? and espacially what about "Origin: Morocco"? And i'm still waiting for answers for my questions above. SimoooIX (talk) 23:26, 8 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Again, WP:SATISFY. I will answer what I choose to answer, generally once. Restating the same question in slightly different ways and demanding more answers is not a productive use of anyone's time. MrOllie (talk) 23:30, 8 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
@MrOllie since you refuse to answer the question. Let's make things even simpler. Don't you see that you have removed a sourced information in your edit? SimoooIX (talk) 23:35, 8 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
I removed a misrepresentation of the source - that is, I removed misinformation. MrOllie (talk) 23:38, 8 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
@MrOllie I'm struggling to understand why describing pastilla as having originated in Morocco would be considered a misrepresentation of "Origin: Morocco". SimoooIX (talk) 23:47, 8 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
I can see why, if you attempt to look at those two words outside the context of the entire entry. But that isn't how it is meant to be read. MrOllie (talk) 23:51, 8 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
@MrOllie If the author intended to convey that the dish originated in Spain, they could have simply stated "Origin: Spain" as they did with "Adafina", "Albondiga", "Hamin" and "Bollo". but instead, they did not! SimoooIX (talk) 00:21, 9 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
I'm tagging @MrOllie since they are involved in this. Simoooix.haddi (talk) 22:36, 6 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Pastilla is moroccan, very important sources to consider.

[edit]

Report

[edit]

Semi-protected edit request on 20 March 2024

[edit]

it’s a Moroccan specialty not a Maghreb specialty please fix the problem 207.30.62.208 (talk) 18:54, 20 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

 Not done - Wikipedia follows the reliable sources on this. - MrOllie (talk) 19:01, 20 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 7 December 2025

[edit]

The pastilla is moroccana and not a shared dish between Algeria and Tunisia, u can refer to intellectual property for this , u r allowing other countries to steal our culture and this can cause a serious law suit ~2025-39116-97 (talk) 15:57, 7 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

 Not done: We won't remove sourced content just to please you, and all your legal threats will achieve is get you blocked. M.Bitton (talk) 16:12, 7 December 2025 (UTC)Reply