Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a236834db8fa2da2

Jump to content

Talk:Partial algebra

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 month ago by Rgdboer in topic Partial

Partial

[edit]

In a revealing passage Bernard Neumann introduced a "partial n-ary operator" and a "full n-ary operator" toward defining algebra in his presentation of universal algebra.

He concedes, "This is a misuse of language – an adjective ought to specialize the object qualified, -- but it is more convenient to do it this way round." By way of explanation, he says "Full operators are much more important, and in the future we will probably drop the 'full' ". Rgdboer (talk) 23:39, 3 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Since an operation (mathematics) on a set is presumed to produce a set member for whatever arguments are presented to it, an operation is total. The adjective partial is a privative adjective which causes the reader some linguistic coercion to give the phrase meaning. In a context of conservative mathematics such adjectives are suppressed, or as Neumann says, a "misuse of language". However, contributors to universal algebra embraced the notion in the 1960s as a frontier of research. Ultimately, some authors realized that relational system (universal algebra) avoided the trap of describing the usual operations as total partial operations. — Rgdboer (talk) 22:46, 24 June 2026 (UTC)Reply