Talk:Paronychodon
Add topicLatest comment: 13 years ago by MWAK in topic Zapsalis
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Paronychodon article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Zapsalis
[edit]Zapsalis redirects here, but the article states it might be a synonym of Richardoestesia? FunkMonk (talk) 23:42, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
- Larson & Currie 2013 acknowledge Zapsalis as a valid separate taxon (see page 9: "Zapsalis abradens, in the current study, is regarded as valid because the distinct morphology is absent in the type specimen of Dromaeosaurus albertensis"). It therefore needs an article of its own.--MWAK (talk) 09:20, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
- Ah, haven't read the paper, though I took the photo from there. Yup, seems it needs an article. I see there's already one in Dutch, wonder who made it! FunkMonk (talk) 20:07, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
- We Dutch are blessed with the gift of Foresight :o).--MWAK (talk) 07:43, 28 January 2013 (UTC)