Talk:Park Chung-seop/GA1
Add topicGA review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Preferwiki (talk · contribs) 02:15, 29 August 2026 (UTC)
Reviewer: Bgsu98 (talk · contribs) 19:55, 4 September 2026 (UTC)
Per Wikipedia talk:Good article review circles#Circle #126. Bgsu98 (Talk) 19:55, 4 September 2026 (UTC)
User:Preferwiki: I apologize for the delay, but this is the last GA that I have promised to do. I will begin it this afternoon. Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:36, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
User:Preferwiki: I have finished reading the article. It is very well-written. I went ahead and made a few cosmetic changes so as to save time since this review is already very late. I do have the following recommendations. Bgsu98 (Talk) 04:10, 20 September 2026 (UTC)
- Hi @Bgsu98, I did revision as per ur suggestion. Would you mind take a look. Thanks in advance. Preferwiki (talk) 06:15, 20 September 2026 (UTC)
- That caption is much better! Bgsu98 (Talk) 06:27, 20 September 2026 (UTC)
- Appearance, Volume III
- In the very first sentence, I would include the following: "Set in 1990s Seoul, Volume III of When Life Gives You Tangerines (episodes 9–12) features a subplot..."
Done
- Production
- The image caption – The casting of the character was overseen by director Kim Won-seok (left) and portrayed by actor Kim Seon-ho (right). – is very awkwardly written.
Done
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear, concise and understandable to an appropriately broad audience, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear, concise and understandable to an appropriately broad audience, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
-- All images have appropriate licenses.
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Source review
[edit]This table lists 7 random passages from throughout the article (9.9% of 71 total passages). These passages contain 7 inline citations (8.3% of 84 in the article). Reference numbers refer to this revision. Generated with the Veracity user script. Bgsu98 (Talk) 04:11, 20 September 2026 (UTC)
| Reference # | Letter | Source | Archive | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Appearance | |||||
| Geum-myeong resolves the misunderstanding by gifting her a complimentary ticket to Cinema Paradiso. Grateful, Chung-seop agrees to fulfill her request for a painting. | |||||
| 6 | maxmovie.com | web.archive.org | |||
| In later episodes, Chung-seop appears less frequently. In his scenes, he is depicted as a supportive husband. | |||||
| 14 | elle.co.kr | web.archive.org | |||
| Production | |||||
| which was held on March 7, 2023. | |||||
| 22 | sportschosun.com | web.archive.org | |||
| Scenes in Geum-myeong's hometown, utilized the Andong outdoor set (Dodong-ri fishing village) and the Yeoncheon set (Hanyeo seafood restaurant). | |||||
| 34 | maxmovie.com | web.archive.org | |||
| Themes | |||||
| Art Insight editor Shin Dong-ha suggested that the drama uses Cinema Paradiso as a narrative device to evoke the spirit of the time. He observed that the series mirrors the film's core themes, including a relationship hindered by a class divide (the breakup between Toto and Elena). Shin also linked the closure of the Cannes Theater during the 1997 Asian financial crisis to the symbolic end of the cinema depicted in the film. Shin further draws thematic parallels between Sicily and Jeju Island, noting their shared histories of conflict: Sicily's World War II and Jeju's 1948 4·3 Incident. While Jeju's narrative often centers on ideological conflict, the series prefers to highlight local resilience, mirroring the romanticized neorealism of the film. Shin posited that Bun-hui's line to her son Chung-seop, "You are just like Toto" functions as a profound message of comfort to the people of Jeju. | |||||
| 40 | artinsight.co.kr | web.archive.org | |||
| Reception and impact | |||||
| To mark its 35th domestic anniversary, Cinema Paradiso returned to South Korean theaters on July 2, 2025; the film originally premiered in Italy in 1988 before its 1990 Korean release. | |||||
| 56 | maxmovie.com | web.archive.org | |||
| Capitalizing on the momentum, Netflix India released a reel comparing Kim Seon-ho's smile with Shah Rukh Khan's iconic moment in Om Shanti Om. The reels went on to make the Top 20 list of the most-viewed Instagram reels. | |||||
| 66 | indianexpress.com | web.archive.org | |||
-- Source review passed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 04:52, 20 September 2026 (UTC)