Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a223ecf53ec314c2

Jump to content

Talk:Paper terrorism

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 6 years ago by BiologicalMe in topic This should be deleted for lack of free sources

RfC

[edit]

Light bulb iconAn RfC: Which descriptor, if any, can be added in front of Southern Poverty Law Center when referenced in other articles? has been posted at the Southern Poverty Law Center talk page. Your participation is welcomed. MrX 17:11, 22 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

First Case of Paper Terrorism

[edit]

It maybe that the first ever modern incident of paper terrorism was the Scientology crime syndicate and its successful racketeering against the Internal Revenue Service. It might be useful to add a section enumerating some actual incidents of paper terrorism, a term I had not heard of until I saw an article on Christian terrorism in the United States this morning. It looked like Scientology did it first. Damotclese (talk) 19:29, 30 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

SPLC

[edit]

I was reading the source for the comment on the SPLC. In the article it stated one instance of someone filing a false report against a judge. The interpretation that it's a 'tactic' used by people against their political opponents (plural) seems off base and a violation of WP:NOR Thorrand (talk) 17:45, 11 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Greetintgs, Thorrand. WP:NOR applies to Wikipedia editors, not to legitimate sources of references and citations such as the SPLC. It looks like the SPLC is the source of the "research," not the editor(s) which added the text to the extant article, so I don't see any kind of bending of any Wikipedia guidelines anywhere. Damotclese (talk) 17:01, 12 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

This should be deleted for lack of free sources

[edit]

this article I feel is biased and only has six sources and out of them I don't think any of them are free you have to pay to see every source.a lot of people can't afford that so I think until we get sources that everyone kids see we either do massive changes to make this neutral or we simply delete the article Bringing TruthToWikiped (talk) 20:07, 31 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nope. See WP:PAYWALL and WP:FRINGE. BiologicalMe (talk) 20:24, 31 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Ranked with terrorism?

[edit]

It's more like civlian resistance.